Kusama or Polkadot, which is the better network for your blockchain project? Both developments are by Gavin Wood. This means that both of the platforms have similar qualities as Ethereum. That is what Gavin Wood is known for. Yet, the two platforms are not the same. Project developers should know the differences between the two platforms. They can determine which option is best suited for their needs. If you have ever wondered which network is better Kusama or Polkadot, then read on to find out more.
No difference in code
The code for Polkdot and Kusama is based on a multichain. This is a heterogeneously shared design. It is based on a variation of the proof of stake. The variation is known as a Nominated Proof of stake (NPos), making for secure transactions of your DOT or KSM. Polkadot and Kusama are permisisionless networks built around a decentralized and autonomous framework. What does this mean? It means that most of the processes are monitored and controlled by code. There are human interactions. For example, the validators and nominators, where data is largely delt with automatically.
Networks for parachains
Both Kusama and Polkadot work on a system supporting Parachains. In short, the system has its own blockchain. The main blockchain is known as the relaychain, as all the other chains are relayed back to the main blockchain. Projects from outside of Kusama or Polkadot are added to the relay chain. This is like teeth on a comb or on-ramps to a highway. These projects can change over time.
Kusama’s parachains are intended for the early development of the project. As the governances are more relaxed on this platform, projects can be more experimental. Kusama is perfect for the early stages of development for a project. Polkadot, is more strenuous on the governances. This is because Polkadot is the adult platform. Kusama is the child. The two are carbon copies of each other. It is the governances and the policies which make Polkadot the more secure and steady. Kusama is more aggressive.
Auctions and Upgrades
One of the fundamental differences in determining whether to use Kusama or Polkadot is in the timeframe of the auctions and the upgrades. Polkadot is slow with the upgrades, taking a month for some. Kusama is faster and auctions and upgrades usually take a week. Why is this?
Kusama is the base point for Polkadot. It is known as a Canary Network. This means that the network’s sole purpose is to be aggressive. It also finds issues and problems which projects may have. Then, the canary network gives those alerts to not only Kusama but to the project owners. This allows for more secure projects to be presented ultimately to Polkadot. Think of it as Kusama being the explorer and Polkadot being the settler. Kusama goes forth and finds the upgrades, features, and project which are to be added to Polkadot. But these projects could be risky.
Kusama uses the quicker bid and auction method. The platform can try out new features and parachains regularly. Those who want to use Kusama need to carefully monitor the site. The parachains and the auctions change regularly. Again, Kusama is best suited for the early stages of a project’s development.
Who should use Polkadot?
Anyone can use the Polkadot network. But certain areas prosper on it. Specifically, those who are in enterprises or in B2B applications will find that the security is better on Polkadot. Financial applications and high value applications which need bank-like security should use the network. Note that Polkadot offers bank-like security. Yet, it is not held under the FDIC or other institution insurances. You should review the terms and the conditions of Polkadot. Do this prior to submitting your project for paralink inclusion.
Apart from the financial-based applications, the network is prime for those who have already tested the project. Also, Polkadot has a slower and more secure means of updating and integrating features. You get a slow and steady approach to anything within the network. It makes monitoring of your project easier. And it requires less time focusing on changes and more time focusing on performance.
Who should use Kusama?
Kusama is best suited for the early stage start up networks. Because of the aggressiveness in finding out the issues with the networks, it is ideal for those who wish to experiment. Then submit those ideas to Polkadot. In terms of the type of networks, Kusama’s network is beneficial to those that have applications that do not require a bank like security. Neither do they need the robustness of the Polkadot platform.
Besides the security, the development stages of a project should be taken into consideration. Kusama is the choice for those who have pre-production projects. Also, those which they want to see eventually integrated with the more secure Polkadot should use it.
Kusama or Polkadot?
Both of the networks are similar in how they are made and in their functionality. Because of the similarities, you should really focus on the intention of your project. Then choose between Kusama or Polkadot. If you need more security and a stable network, then choose Polkadot. However, if you are seeking to experiment with new features use Kusama. If you are in the beginning processes of your project, you may wish to use Kusama. Keep in mind that each platform has its own cryptocurrency. So, if you intend on using both, you will need to purchase both KSM and DOT.
Before using any of the platforms, it is strongly suggested that you review all the trading and auction terms and conditions. Those engaging in auctions are encouraged to research the projects before bidding. Monitor both to see the growth and evolutions predicted to take place.